I agree that, as the book said, the government should act like a "watchman," overlooking the activities of the economy, making sure they don't get out of hand, but not interfering unless absolutely necessary.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Political Economic Systems
Unsurprisingly, I mostly agree with liberalism as the best form of an economic system. I believe people should be able to spend and earn money freely, without many restrictions. I believe people should be responsible for their own economic behavior and well-being, and the government should not interfere too much with this freedom. However, I do believe there should be a good balance between how much freedom the people have and how many restrictions the government sets. Finding this balance may be tricky, but if found, it will lead to, in my opinion, a very successful, economically strong nation. Acting freely with money (earning or spending) will lead to competition, which leads to innovation, which produces capitalism, or the system of production that is based on private ownership and free markets. Capitalism, in my opinion, with that right balance, is the key to a healthy economy. Taxation is an area where I'm conflicted. Liberalism states that taxation should be kept to a minimum, but I feel that things are never as simple as that. Now, I don't think people should be taxed everywhere, right and left, but certain taxes are important and helpful. This is an area, again, that needs a careful balance in order to produce success.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Well stated and well reasoned, Tori. I think the tax thing makes sense in the bigger picture of determining the types of public goods and services that a society should provide. If you favor great collective equality, higher taxes are necessary to pay for the public goods and services which will achieve that goal. In a gov.t that is more focused on freedom, you will not be providing so many goods and services, hence taxes will not need to be as high. One way that Thatcher and Reagan reduced the size of govt. was by cutting taxes. Without the money to fund programs, govt. had to shrink.
ReplyDelete